
Disclosure: Rocket Doctor AI Inc. has paid FRC a fee for research coverage and distribution of reports. See last page for other important disclosures, rating, and risk definitions.
The analyst’s rating and fair value are one click away. Free FRC account, no credit card.
Already have an account?
Price and Volume (1-year)


* Rocket Doctor AI has paid FRC a fee for research coverage and distribution of reports. See last page for other important disclosures, rating, and risk definitions. All figures in C$ unless otherwise specified.
Company Overview: A two-pronged business model targeting patients (B2C) and healthcare institutions (B2B)

B2C: Physician-Funded Model (Primary Revenue Driver)
B2B: Institutions license AI tools for training and care
The Rocket Doctor Process

Offers a streamlined virtual care experience from patient intake to payment
Generates revenue from doctors through monthly subscriptions and per-appointment platform fees
Target Markets

Source: FRC / Company
Operating in Canada since 2020; currently focused on U.S. expansion
RD’s current target pool includes ~46M people across its target regions in the U.S. and Canada

Source: Company
Primarily targets patients using government-funded health insurance (provincial in Canada and Medicaid / Medicare in the U.S.)
Partnerships with ~20 insurers in the U.S.
Financials
2025 and 2024 results are not comparable, as material revenue commenced only after the Rocket Doctor acquisition in April 2025.

Q3-2025 marked the first full quarter post–Rocket Doctor acquisition, generating $0.53M in revenue, which grew to $0.70M in Q4
2025 revenue was $1.74M, 8% higher than our estimate

Source: FRC / Company
Approximately 79% of revenue came from per-appointment fees, with most of the remainder from subscription fees

Strong gross margin of 87% vs 88% forecast; well above the 53% healthcare tech average
G&A and R&D expenses were in line with estimates, while sales and marketing exceeded expectations, reflecting continued investment to drive patient adoption; the QoQ revenue growth indicates that marketing spend is proving effective
As a result, EBITDA and EPS were below expectations

Adj. EPS: ($0.12) vs ($0.10 expected)

Ended 2025 with $0.64M cash, and minimal debt; raised $6.44M post year-end via equity and warrants, strengthening the balance sheet
In-the-money options can bring in $2M

Source: FRC / Company
We do not foresee a need for additional capital raises this year
FRC Valuation and Rating

As Q4 expenses came in above expectations, we are lowering our 2026 EPS estimate

We are continuing to value RD based on the assumption that its network will capture 1.5% of its target market in Canada, and 3% in the U.S. by 2032
We assume a higher market share in the U.S., reflecting relatively high barriers to entry, and RD’s established insurer partnerships

Source: FRC
Our DCF model returned a fair value estimate of $1.96/share (previously $2.04/share), primarily due to share dilution since our previous report

*We use the present value of our 20 30 EBITDA estimate for RD in this calculation.
Source: FRC / S&P Capital IQ
RD is trading at 6x forward EBITDA (previously 8x) vs the sector average of 17x (previously 22x), a 65% discount
Applying the sector multiple yields a comparables valuation of $1.75/share (previously $2.15/share)
We reiterate our BUY rating, and adjust our fair value estimate from $2.10 to $1.86/share (the average of our DCF and comparables valuations). The valuation decline is primarily due to share dilution. Overall, RD’s latest results highlight continued traction on the platform. We believe expanding U.S. insurer access , and a strengthened balance sheet, support a clearer path toward profitability.
Risks
We believe the company is exposed to the following key risks (not exhaustive):
We are maintaining a risk rating of 4 (Speculative)
APPENDIX


